As usual, some of the best commentary is found on Letters to the Editor pages across this country.
SO KING Jean has decreed all will be well if each Canadian reduces his/her “greenhouse gas” emissions by one tonne per year.
Where would I make the cuts, Jean?
I don’t own a car any more (relative income has fallen over the years), I don’t have an air conditioner sopping up kilowatts (I simply sweat and suffer), I rarely cook at home or use my oven, and when I do cook, I use my microwave. I only watch about four hours of TV per week, and I read using a 25-watt bedside lamp.
I run my dishwasher once a week. I never put my laundry in a dryer – I hang-dry it in my apartment. I don’t use dry-cleaning services.
I don’t smoke.
I don’t fly around for vacations. I paddle a canoe, instead of using a power boat (but I’d love to be able to roar around the lakes … ).
How much farther down the lifestyle rungs must I descend, to find my share of the cut?
Per UN data, Canada produces approximately 2% of the world’s total greenhouse gases. But “Mr. Legacy” feels the requirements of Kyoto are “worth the costs.”
Will he personally be willing to tell the holders of the 244,000 jobs to be lost (Liberal figures) that they must lose their jobs so Canada can cut 6% or 10% of the 2% we put into the atmosphere?
What possible difference will this make to the planet, when China, India, Venezuela, etc., are running unfettered?
Billions lost, hundreds of thousands of families impacted, so we can cut three tenths of a percent of the world total output?
Larry Grosfield
Peterborough
(Chretien’s headlong rush to embrace the Kyoto protocol could prove the biggest Liberal disaster yet. Some legacy!)